The Polarizers
POSTWAR ARCHITECTS OF OUR PARTISAN ERA
336 pages | 8 halftones | 6 x 9 | © 2017
Even in this most partisan and dysfunctional of eras, we can all agree on one thing: Washington is broken. Politicians take increasingly inflexible and extreme positions, leading to gridlock, partisan warfare, and the sense that our seats of government are nothing but cesspools of hypocrisy, childishness, and waste. The shocking reality, though, is that modern polarization was a deliberate project carried out by Democratic and Republican activists.
In The Polarizers, Sam Rosenfeld details why bipartisanship was seen as a problem in the postwar period and how polarization was then cast as the solution. Republicans and Democrats feared that they were becoming too similar, and that a mushy consensus imperiled their agendas and even American democracy itself. Thus began a deliberate move to match ideology with party label—with the toxic results we now endure. Rosenfeld reveals the specific politicians, intellectuals, and operatives who worked together to heighten partisan discord, showing that our system today is not (solely) a product of gradual structural shifts but of deliberate actions motivated by specific agendas. Rosenfeld reveals that the story of Washington’s transformation is both significantly institutional and driven by grassroots influences on both the left and the right.
The Polarizers brilliantly challenges and overturns our conventional narrative about partisanship, but perhaps most importantly, it points us toward a new consensus: if we deliberately created today’s dysfunctional environment, we can deliberately change it.
CloseIn The Polarizers, Sam Rosenfeld details why bipartisanship was seen as a problem in the postwar period and how polarization was then cast as the solution. Republicans and Democrats feared that they were becoming too similar, and that a mushy consensus imperiled their agendas and even American democracy itself. Thus began a deliberate move to match ideology with party label—with the toxic results we now endure. Rosenfeld reveals the specific politicians, intellectuals, and operatives who worked together to heighten partisan discord, showing that our system today is not (solely) a product of gradual structural shifts but of deliberate actions motivated by specific agendas. Rosenfeld reveals that the story of Washington’s transformation is both significantly institutional and driven by grassroots influences on both the left and the right.
The Polarizers brilliantly challenges and overturns our conventional narrative about partisanship, but perhaps most importantly, it points us toward a new consensus: if we deliberately created today’s dysfunctional environment, we can deliberately change it.
Introduction
1 The Idea of Responsible Partisanship, 1945–1952
2 Democrats and the Politics of Principle, 1952–1960
3 A Choice, Not an Echo, 1948–1964
4 Power in Movement, 1961–1968
5 The Age of Party Reform, 1968–1975
6 The Making of a Vanguard Party, 1969–1980
7 Liberal Alliance-Building for Lean Times, 1972–1980
8 Dawn of a New Party Period, 1980–2000
Conclusion: Polarization without Responsibility, 2000–2016
Bibliographic Essay
Bibliography of Archival Sources
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
1 The Idea of Responsible Partisanship, 1945–1952
2 Democrats and the Politics of Principle, 1952–1960
3 A Choice, Not an Echo, 1948–1964
4 Power in Movement, 1961–1968
5 The Age of Party Reform, 1968–1975
6 The Making of a Vanguard Party, 1969–1980
7 Liberal Alliance-Building for Lean Times, 1972–1980
8 Dawn of a New Party Period, 1980–2000
Conclusion: Polarization without Responsibility, 2000–2016
Bibliographic Essay
Bibliography of Archival Sources
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
History: American History
Political Science: American Government and Politics
No comments:
Post a Comment