Americans united on this day 30 years ago like never before. Six and a half million people formed a chain called “Hands Across America” to raise money for the nation’s hungry and homeless.
|It was planned by U.S.A. for Africa, the charity known for recording the song “We Are the World” in 1985.|
|The human chain began in Lower Manhattan, with views of the Statue of Liberty, continued across New Jersey and to Washington, Chicago, Memphis, Dallas, Phoenix, ending in Long Beach, Calif.|
|It crossed through about 500 communities across four time zones.|
|At We Are The World,” “America the Beautiful” and the “Hands Across America” theme.in New York and in Los Angeles, they joined hands for 15 minutes, enough time to sing “|
|The chain included fans at baseball games, staff members at the White House, scuba divers in rivers, and Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck at Disneyland.|
|One honorary chairman, the singer Kenny Rogers, delivered on his promise of a concert to get people to stand in the desert at the Texas-New Mexico border.|
|Still, there were some gaps in the line, which were filled with a chain of paper dolls, made by children, and rope.|
|After costs, only about $15 million was distributed, but it remains a spectacle like no other.|
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
"Hands Across America": Note for a discussion, "E Pluribus Unum? What Keeps the United States United"
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
The Fragmented Society - Note for a discussion, "E Pluribus Unum? What Keeps the United States United"
David Brooks MAY 20, 2016, New York Times
There are just a few essential reads if you want to understand the American
social and political landscape today. Robert Putnam’s “Our Kids,” Charles
Murray’s “Coming Apart” and a few other books deserve to be on that list.
Today, I’d add Yuval Levin’s fantastic new book, “The Fractured Republic.”
Levin starts with the observation that our politics and much of our
thinking is drenched in nostalgia for the 1950s and early 1960s. The left is
nostalgic for the relative economic equality of that era. The right is nostalgic
for the cultural cohesion. The postwar era has become our unconscious ideal of
what successful America looks like. It was, Levin notes, an age of cohesion and
But we have now moved to an age of decentralization and fragmentation.
At one point in the book he presents a series of U-shaped graphs showing this
Party polarization in Congress declined steadily from 1910 to 1940, but it
has risen steadily since. We are a less politically cohesive nation.
The share of national income that went to the top 1 percent declined
steadily from 1925 to about 1975, but has risen steadily since. We are a less
economically cohesive nation.
The share of Americans who were born abroad dropped steadily from
1910 to 1970. But the share of immigrants has risen steadily ever since, from
4.7 percent of the population to nearly 14 percent. We are a more diverse and
less demographically cohesive nation.
In case after case we’ve replaced attachments to large established
institutions with commitments to looser and more flexible networks. Levin
argues that the Internet did not cause this shift but embodies today’s
individualistic, diffuse society.
This shift has created some unpleasant realities. Levin makes a nice
distinction between centralization and consolidation. In economic, cultural
and social terms, America is less centralized. But people have simultaneously
concentrated off on the edges — separated into areas of, say, concentrated
wealth and concentrated poverty. The middle has hollowed out in sphere after
sphere. Socially, politically and economically we’re living within “bifurcated
For example, religious life has bifurcated. Church attendance has declined
twice as fast among people without high school diplomas as among people
with college degrees. With each additional year of education, the likelihood of
attending religious services rises by 15 percent.
We’re also less embedded in tight, soul-forming institutions. Levin makes
another distinction between community — being part of a congregation — and
identity — being, say, Jewish. Being part of community takes time and involves
restrictions. Merely having an identity doesn’t. In our cultural emphasis and
life, we’ve gone from a community focus to an identity focus.
Our politicians try to find someone to blame for these problems: banks,
immigrants or, for Donald Trump, morons generally. But that older
consolidated life could not have survived modernity and is never coming back.
It couldn’t have survived globalization, feminism and the sexual revolution,
the rising tide of immigration and the greater freedom consumers now enjoy.
Our fundamental problems are the downsides of transitions we have
made for good reasons: to enjoy more flexibility, creativity and individual
choice. For example, we like buying cheap products from around the world.
But the choices we make as consumers make life less stable for us as
Levin says the answer is not to dwell in confusing, frustrating nostalgia.
It’s through a big push toward subsidiarity, devolving choice and power down
to the local face-to-face community level, and thus avoiding the excesses both
of rigid centralization and alienating individualism. A society of empowered
local neighborhood organizations is a learning society. Experiments happen
and information about how to solve problems flows from the bottom up.
I’m acknowledged in the book, but I learned something new on every
page. Nonetheless, I’d say Levin’s emphasis on subsidiarity and local
community is important but insufficient. We live within a golden chain,
connecting self, family, village, nation and world. The bonds of that chain have
to be repaired at every point, not just the local one.
It’s not 1830. We Americans have a national consciousness. People who
start local groups are often motivated by a dream of scaling up and changing
the nation and the world. Our distemper is not only caused by local
fragmentation but by national dysfunction. Even Levin writes and thinks in
nationstate terms (his prescription is Wendell Berry, but his intellectual and
moral sources are closer to a nationalist like Abraham Lincoln).
That means there will have to be a bigger role for Washington than he or
current Republican orthodoxy allows, with more radical ideas, like national
service, or a national effort to seed locally run early education and
As in ancient Greece and Rome, local communities won’t survive if the
national project disintegrates. Our structural problems are national and global
and require big as well as little reforms.
The literature of fragmentation -- Note for a discussion, "E Pluribus Unum? What Keeps the United States United"
Technology makes it much easier for us to connect to people who share some single common interest,” said Marc Dunkelman, adding that it also makes it easier for us to avoid “face-to-face interactions with diverse ideas.” He touched on this in an incisive 2014 book, “The Vanishing Neighbor,” which belongs with Haidt’s work ["The Righteous Mind"] and with “Bowling Alone,” “Coming Apart” and “The Fractured Republic” in the literature of modern American fragmentation, a booming genre all its own.--Frank Bruni, "How Facebook Warps Our Worlds," New York Times
Monday, May 23, 2016
Urgent Press Release
Mr. Trump has decided that, given how criticized his hands' size are (see below), he will receive a hands-enhancement operation.
He soon will be undergoing a minor surgical intervention that will allow him to shake hands with a greater number of his millions of supporters who faithfully believe he should be so handled.
The operation will be performed in Moscow, courtesy of Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, a sincere admirer of our hand-some billionaire mogul.
Thanks to the wonders of post-Soviet medicine, Mr. "new-hands" Trump will implement his desire be a "hands-on" president.
Meanwhile, please take note of the Trump family's sincere, humanitarian concern with protecting our hands from inclement weather:
abcnews.go.com/Politics/history-donald-trump-small-hands-insult/story?...Mar 4, 2016 - Trump Still Riled Up Over 'Little Hands' Insult From Years Ago.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/.../donald-trump-my...Mar 21, 2016 - Trump was asked whether he regretted talking about the size of his hands -- and making an unmistakable allusion to his genitalia -- at a recent ...
The Washington Post
- "Hands Across America": Note for a discussion, "E ...
- The Fragmented Society - Note for a discussion, "E...
- The literature of fragmentation -- Note for a disc...
- Disunited We Stand - Note for a discussion, "E Plu...
- Trump Taps Into the Anxiety of American White Male...
- Urgent Press Release: Donald Trump to receive Hand...
- Asian-American/African-American/Redskins -- Note f...
- History of the Interstate Highway System - Note fo...
- New books on 18th century Russian history
- IF YOU DON'T LIKE OUTSTANDING CULTURAL FIGURES, AR...
- Education: On the anniversary of Brown v. Board, n...
- FYI, JB Book reviews/articles in the on-line journ...
- Twitter Picks Russia Over the U.S.
- Millennials, that's the question - Note for a disc...
- Perpetual War ...
- Blast from the Past: The Mind of Condoleezza Rice
- Blast from the Past: The Mind of Condoleezza Rice
- Entertainment Madeleine LeBeau, French actress who...
- Most Common Country of Origin of Immigrants in the...
- Here’s Everyone Who’s Immigrated to the U.S. Since...
- English in America ...
- Texas Republicans Inch Closer to Secession: Note f...
- New Poll Finds 86 Percent Of Americans Don't Want ...
- Budweiser Is Renaming Itself “America” for the Nex...
- U.S. Can’t Say Whether or Not $759 Million Spent o...
- Black Americans See Gains in Life Expectancy - Not...
- A depressingly accurate 29-word description of the...
- Head of the Class - Note for a Discussion, "E Plur...
- A Facebook comment re McDonald's
- The Divided American Dream: Note for a discussion,...
- Simon Sebag Montefiore on The Romanovs 1613-1918
- Astonishing Russian Faces
- "[I]n America today, the only thing more terrifyin...
- A cordial Facebook exchange on Russian History ..
- Moscow-based Movie Critic Mark Teeter on the film,...
- One Week in April, Four Toddlers Shot and Killed T...
- Diplomacy is footnote-free ...
- The State of Our Union -- Note for a lecture, "E P...
- If Trump destroys GOP, he may take DNC down with h...
- The American Dream is Out of Reach
- Democracies end when they are too democratic. And ...
- American Anger: It’s Not the Economy. It’s the Oth...
- The Fractured Republic -- Note for a lecture, "E P...
- Republicans and Democrats are fixated on nostalgia...
- Trump understood the voters the GOP forgot - Note ...
- America Needs a Prime Minister - Note for a lectur...
- Teeter on Obama, U.S./Russia
- ▼ May (47)
- ► 2015 (858)
- ► 2014 (891)
- ► 2013 (616)
- ► 2012 (187)
- ► 2011 (115)
- ► 2010 (98)
- ► 2009 (42)
- John Brown
- A Princeton PhD, was a US diplomat for over 20 years, mostly in Eastern Europe, and was promoted to the Senior Foreign Service in 1997. For the Open World Leadership Center, he speaks with its inquisitive young delegates from Europe/Eurasia on the topic, "E Pluribus Unum? What Keeps the United States United." Affiliated with Georgetown University for over ten years, he shares ideas with students about public diplomacy. The papers of his deceased father -- poet and diplomat John L. Brown -- are stored at Georgetown University Special Collections at the Lauinger Library -- manuscript materials valuable to scholars interested in post-WWII U.S.-European cultural relations. This blog is dedicated to him, Dr. John L. Brown, a remarkable linguist/humanist who wrote in the Foreign Service Journal (1964) -- years before "soft power" was ever coined -- that "The CAO [Cultural Affairs Officer] soon comes to realize that his job is really a form of love-making and that making love is never really successful unless both partners are participating."