Thursday, December 19, 2013

USG public diplomacy began on February 1, 1942 -- Walter Roberts


U.S. Public Diplomacy: A Look to the Past

by Walter Roberts, American Diplomacy


The Public Diplomacy Council held a well attended Forum on US Public Diplomacy at the Department of State on November 12. Its title was "US Public Diplomacy- A Look to the Past - A Look to the Future." PDC's president Don Bishop asked America's most senior public diplomacy officer Walter Roberts to say a few words about the beginnings of America's international broadcasting. Dr. Roberts'remarks follow:

On February 1, 1942 — almost 72 years ago — seven weeks after Pearl Harbor forced America into war — the US government started engaging in public diplomacy. This action was approved by President Franklin Roosevelt at the recommendation of Col. William Donovan and Robert Sherwood, the playwright who served as Roosevelt’s speech writer and information advisor. It was Sherwood who coined the term Voice of America. Public diplomacy’s birthplace was 270 Madison Ave. in New York City.

I know that some of my cultural program friends say that the conduct of American public diplomacy started earlier when Nelson Rockefeller’s Inter-American agency built bi-national centers in Latin America. I also know that several of my academic friends speak of Benjamin Franklin’s and Thomas Jefferson’s work in Paris. But I still say that American public diplomacy as we conduct and understand it today began when the US government set out to reach the people of Germany, France and Italy with broadcasts in their languages. And that occurred on February 1, 1942.

The US government had no facilities to reach these audiences. It did not own any short-wave transmitters. There were short-wave transmitters owned by private companies like General Electric, Westinghouse, NBC, CBS, but they were too weak to carry an audible signal to Europe. So these broadcasts in German, French and Italian were sent by telephone to London — there was already an underground cable connecting the US with Britain — where the British Broadcasting Corporation — the BBC — put them on medium wave transmitters which could be heard in Germany, France and Italy. 

In the course of the war, the US built powerful short-wave transmitters that reached every corner of the world in multiple languages. Years later, television was added as a facility. Then internet appeared on the horizon. Today facebook and twitter have been added. I have no idea what new communication tools will appear in the future. But of one thing I am sure: international broadcasting is here to stay because there is no other medium through which, with one click, hundreds of million people can be reached.

International broadcasting is and will continue to be a vital element of public diplomacy which in turn is a vital element of diplomacy.bluestar


***


From: John Brown, "Empire of Ideas," American Diplomacy (April 2013):

"[I]t can be said ... public diplomacy — or, more precisely, its assumptions and aims — has been long been part of America’s relations with the world. The first U.S. propaganda agency that dared not speak its name, Wilson’s Committee on Public Information, 1917-1919 ... was served, according to its chairman, George Creel, by more than 150,000 people5, far greater than the number of employees in today’s Public Diplomacy office at the State Department.


But to identify the origins of U.S. public diplomacy we must go back further in the past, to the very beginning of America’s history: to the Declaration of Independence, written to show respect and to woo 'the opinions of mankind.' And some of its signers (e.g., Franklin and Jefferson, called our 'first public diplomats'6) served their new country by representing it abroad."


JB Comment: However important, various media -- from speaking to twittering -- do not essentially define public diplomacy. At its best, public diplomacy is about the "last three feet" of human contact (non-mass media broadcasting, non-"virtual") -- and, at its very best (which is very rare indeed) some have the audacity of calling it "love."

No comments: