Is anyone speaking?

"I'm on Facebook so I don't have to talk to people."

--A bright and dedicated student at a major American University (paraphrase)

***

In the new report, "The Heart of the Matter: The Humanities and Social Sciences for a vibrant, competitive, and secure nation," by the American Academy of arts and Sciences, there is the following passage in its executive summary regarding one of its goals:

Support full literacy as the foundation for all learning. The nation depends on a fully literate populace—on citizens whose reading, writing, speaking, and analytical skills improve over a lifetime. These are among the principal skills that the humanities and social sciences teach, and they must be nurtured at every level of education.

I highlight the word speaking because, in the commentaries I have seen on the report (and doubtless I have not seen them all), I did not notice emphasis on how the humanities can contribute to the pleasure of conversation (known in some circles as "oral communication"). The humanities' role in improving writing is underscored, but a far more fundamental way of sharing thoughts and experiences with others  -- through the electronically unfiltered spoken word -- is not cited by those who share the report's emphasis on "full literacy as the foundation for all learning."

I find this omission odd and unsettling, especially given the state of speaking in our Republic today. For anyone with an ear for language, it is apparent that Americans' growing inability to talk with one another one-on-one could be cause for concern, leading as it may to social if not intellectual isolation. While words can be digitally disseminated, direct speech enriches, with its unique and magical qualities, the lives of those speaking with others, as Plato's dialogues demonstrate so well.

But at modern U.S. universities, direct teacher-student discourse is becoming increasingly rare. "Expert" professors pontificate through jargon-filled lectures and PowerPoint presentations that do not necessarily lead to person-to-person dialogue. The latest academic trend is for online courses where the spoken word is absent.

And young people, raised on video games with which they "interact" but not converse, are reluctant -- if not incapable -- of expressing themselves in comprehensible complete sentences. Verbal tics -- the endless repetition of "like" being perhaps the worst among them -- proliferate. Indeed, the whole notion of focusing on the words of a person (s) with whom you are physically present, rather than "hooking-up" while momentarily not staring at your electronic device, is becoming increasingly passé.

Some are not upset by this disappearance of the spoken word exchanged between persons in the "non-virtual" world, seeing the extinction of down-to-earth conversation as yet another part of an uncontrollable Darwinian evolution -- mankind's "adaptation" to the brave cyberspace world of universal interconnectivity, of which books are, granted, an earlier version (Plato, as is well-known, castigated writing).

Others, in defense of the importance of face-to-face conversation  -- what speaking, in its fullest sense, is about -- would suggest that sharing words directly with other human beings, be they colleagues, friends, or a lover, is, indeed, what makes us, perhaps more than anything else, human -- and thus what the humanities should nurture and protect. As the above-cited report underscores, "Even in a digital age, the spoken ... word remains the most basic unit of our interactions, the very basis of our humanity."

Yes, let's read, write, and use the internet, but let's not abandon the miracle and pleasure of the living, spoken word enjoyed in the real world with persons other than oneself.

***

Here' a piece I wrote some years ago on the above matter: 

"It has always seemed to me the real art in this business is not so much moving information or guidance or policy five or 10,000 miles. That is an electronic problem. The real art is to move it the last three feet in face to face conversation."

--Edward R. Murrow, director of the United States Information Agency (USIA), which handled outreach to foreign audiences during the Kennedy administration and the Cold War, on ABC TV's "Issues and Answers," August 4, 1963.

John Brown's Body Enterprises, the USA's leading producer of Awesome Communications Software (TM), is proud to announce its latest Killer App, the result of literally thousands of years of development. This unique product, which Computerworld has predicted will be the craze of Generation-Beyond-the-I, has the following unique features:

It requires no factory-produced hardware;

It automatically reinvents itself, reacting to changes in social situations, spontaneously improving communications to meet evolving human needs;

Its grid -- called vocalcords -- are 99.9999% glitch-free and are more reliable than today's bug-infested software;

It cannot be accused of reflecting American capitalistic cultural imperialism, as it is a universally-conceived consumer item;

Unlike electronic products, it poses no danger to the environment;

Its use, not only in childhood but beyond, leads to improved brain development and (according to social scientists) higher IQ;

To get started, its users need no instruction books or specialized training;

It's a life-long product, unlike other communications tools that last only a few years;

To function, it requires no awkward "thumbing" or time-consuming pressing of keys;

Anyone in the world, no matter his/her background, social status, education, or income, can use this product;

Far more effectively than Twitter, Facebook, or other social media, it brings people together, leading to significant exchanges of ideas and in-depth relationships, including love;

And last but not least this remarkable communications creation is... TOTALLY FREE

The name of this killer-of-all killer App?

Face-to-face conversation!

No, no need to buy it online -- you already have it in you if you use it!

Note: While this product can be used by every human being on the face of the earth, it can be especially useful for diplomats, including those involved in public diplomacy.

***

"I think we have to talk more. I don’t think it is no romance, but not enough. I’ll tell you what else worries me. I see young people holding hands and with the other hand they’re texting. People are going to lose, and not just young people, older ones are going to lose the ability to converse, the ability of conversation. They are being fed the news all the time."

--Dr. Ruth, in Laura Hambleton, "Dr. Ruth says some frank things about aging and sex," Washington Post (June 25, 2013)

Image, "Platonic Academy," from

Top image from, with caption: This picture showing young love in its purest, simplest form:; below image from, with caption: This adorable photo of a baby logging into her very first social network account:

NOTE (June 27): This entry, due to its autor's ambiguity on the subject, has been amended a number of time since its original posting.