By E.J.
Dionne Jr., Sunday, June 2, 8:14 PM - Washington Post
You wanted Father Andrew Greeley as your friend and not your
enemy. You got the sense he was born with his fists up and his loyalties fully
formed. He was ready to do battle at the first signs of disrespect toward those
he cared about.
Understanding Greeley,
the priest, sociologist and novelist who died last week at 85, is essential
to understanding the last half-century of American Catholic history and the
glorious contradictions of politics.
He was a liberal whose capacity for impatience with other
liberals was legendary. This applied especially to reformers who disparaged his
beloved Daley machine in Chicago .
Yet this resolute Irishman who once used the phrase “marginal but not
alienated” as an apt sociological description of himself was bolder than so
many others in the positions he staked out. Not one for understatement, Greeley titled one of his
last books: “A
Stupid, Unjust, and Criminal War: Iraq 2001-2007.”
Did I mention books?
Greeley wrote
so many that his obituary writers couldn’t agree on a count. In a lovely New
York Times article on Greeley , Peter
Steinfels pegged the number at “more than 120.” Joe
Holley wrote in The Post of “more than 100 nonfiction works and 50
novels.” John
Allen risked precision in the National Catholic Reporter: 72
nonfiction books and 66 novels.
“I suppose I have the Irish weakness for words gone wild,” Greeley
told the New York Times in 1981. “Besides, if you’re celibate, you have to
do something.”
Oh, yes, and he had a fine gift for revenge recast as
generosity. He always harbored a grudge against the University of Chicago ,
which granted him a PhD in 1962 but denied him tenure 11 years later. He
believed he was the victim of a classic form of academic prejudice: against
Catholic priests.
But then he made piles of cash on his best-selling novels,
typically described as “steamy.” (“The
Cardinal Sins” and “Thy
Brother’s Wife” sold in the millions.) So in 1984, he was able to endow
a chair in Roman Catholic studies, named after his parents, at his former
school. He was uncharacteristically diplomatic at the time, but everyone knew
the joy he felt when a university that wouldn’t offer him tenure was quite
happy to take his money.
As Greeley
might say, let me be clear: I loved the guy and owe him a deep intellectual
debt. I began reading him in college and still think his 1972 book “Unsecular
Man: The Persistence of Religion” is an underrated classic. Its first
sentences are so completely Greeley :
“Let us be clear at the beginning: this is a volume of dissent. It rejects most
of the conventional wisdom about the contemporary religious situation.”
Back then, when so many genuinely wise people thought
religion was on an inevitable path to decline, Greeley insisted that it wasn’t
— and more than four decades later, it’s fair to say that Greeley got the
better of the argument.
He was also a fierce champion of the white ethnic working
class. A strong supporter of civil rights, he nonetheless hated what he felt
was upscale liberal disdain for the Irish, the Poles, the Italians and others
who rose from the white immigrant working class. It infuriated him to see these
people — his people — dismissed as racist and their forms of ethnic
consciousness denied legitimacy. It’s no accident that as a Greeley-phile, I
ended up writing a doctoral dissertation on the politics of race, class and
ethnicity.
And yes, he was a Catholic priest, an identity he cherished
but in an oh-so-complex way. Anyone he saw as unfairly attacking the church,
its faithful and its institutions (particularly its schools) would face the
full Greeley
onslaught. But few could match his ire against the church on matters ranging
from the
pedophilia scandal (he was an early critic) to what he viewed as its
wrong turn on birth control, whose costs he documented. He took on various
bishops and archbishops with the alacrity of a schoolyard brawler.
Yet, to the end, he was incorrigibly
Catholic. “For the last 30 years,” he
once wrote, “the hierarchy and the clergy have done just about everything
they could to drive the laity out of the church and have not succeeded. It
seems unlikely that they will ever drive the stubborn lay folk out of the church
because the lay folk like being Catholic.” Yes, and we liked Father Greeley
because he spoke up for us. Who knows what the Almighty is in for?
No comments:
Post a Comment