Why is it? -- Washington Post vs. Washington Times

Why is it that I, a well-meaning anarchist, am reading, in recent  months, with more interest the Washington Times rather than the Washington Post? Could it be that it (the WT) has better proofreaders, and that its readers don't have to put up with Cohen/Rubin (op-ed writers of immense pretention/ignorance; see the astute comments on these hucksters at)? Also, perhaps most important to this "one of the 99%," Internet access to WT is free.